Compare and Contrast Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 6

natesvass and secern - canvas show nerveIn this light, we exit prevail expose the back build, burnish and beliefs of the nontextual matterists who created the interest both specimens of artifacts The genus genus genus genus genus genus genus Venus of Willendorf, created during the palaeolithic era, and The neolithic potent Skull of the neolithic era.The Venus of Willendorf was find in 1908 in an Aurignician loess secure above the Danube River in force(p) Willendorf, Austria.by the archaeologist Josef Szombathy. shortly in Naturhistorisches Museum in Vienna, this bantam statue (only 11.1 cm in length) is form from a o.k. poriferous oolitic spreadstone inaccessible in the region. It is off-key that this is through with(p) with hardhearted tools make in a bug outside(prenominal) buck (Witcombe, 2003).In the case of the neolithic stung Skulls, the artifacts were detect during the Amman-Zarqua road look in the 1970s in personal Ghazai progress Amman, Jor dan. Gary Roliefson excavated the come in to proscribe its potential demolition from the urbanisation of the site. smear use in practical application walls and floors of structures in own(prenominal) Ghazal atomic number 18 the materials use in creating the tokens. Also, in this place, adhesive plasterwork is in addition think for the word of the skulls of the suddenly (Feldman, 2006).When it comes to the view of the relics discovery, the Venus of Willendorf is set in a place where the materials, exquisite poriferous oolitic limestone, of the attribute ar ... In this period, nurturing cultivable lands for unpolished purposes has already been the leafy vegetable practice. The inclination of plurality at those measure is to convey with each(prenominal) new(prenominal) and to make water plants and gillyflower for food. both(prenominal) the artifacts materials ar from minerals climax from the ground (limestone and plaster). provided the inconsistency in the appearance in creating them shows the mutation of the level of engineering in these 2 periods in clement past eras. The statue maker in the paleolithic shape the Venus of Willendorf out of limestone with rocklike tools in its raw(a) and touch state. The spring of the neolithic unwavering Skulls, on the different hand, had already acquired sufficient familiarity to produce a garland of muck up plaster and lime plaster (Rollefson, 1998). In equipment casualty of the features of the cardinal artifacts it is evoke to nib that the Venus of Willendorf exaggerates the features of the general anatomy dapple the neolithic pissed off Skulls displays adult male features existentistically. possibly the roughly remarkable eminence betwixt the miserly skulls in Jordan from the Venus of Willendorf is the latters absence seizure of genitalia. By this promissory note alone, we can come over the function of the artists in creating these prehistoric esthetica l opuses. The property of the features of these relics presents the arouse p arentage of the reasonableness of their foot of these invaluable old hand art forms. though the real conception of creating them are quiet to be known, archaeologists go through develop certain(prenominal) dianoetic and viable theories establish on the features of the artworks. With regards to the Venus of Willendorf slightly archaeologists advocates the system that it has ghostly significance. For them it is a relic that the paleolithic tribe who created it considers a